![]() We reverse the District Court on both grounds and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. ![]() 1997), which was handed down after the District Court ruled in this case, Mondzelewski contends that the District Court erred in rejecting his retaliation claim on the ground that he is not disabled. On appeal, Mondzelewski argues that the District Court erred in holding that he is not disabled within the meaning of the ADA because he is not substantially limited in the major life activity of working. The District Court granted summary judgment for Pathmark and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction on the state-law claims. Free with Kindle Unlimited membership Join Now Available instantly Or 5.99 to buy Best Seller Right Man, Right Time by Meghan Quinn 4.5 (3,796) Kindle Edition 000 Free with Kindle Unlimited membership Join Now Available instantly Or 4. Free with Kindle Unlimited membership Join Now. ![]() There you'll find all sorts of titles, including. Part of: A Brief History Series (2 books) 4.6 (94,983) Kindle Edition. (collectively, "Pathmark"), asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. You'll need to download Amazon's free Kindle app, which you can set up on your Kindle, tablet, or cell phone no Amazon device required. Mondzelewski ("Mondzelewski") and his wife, Rebecca Mondzelewski, sued Pathmark Stores, Inc., and Supermarkets General Corp.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |